<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<XML>
<ISCJOURNAL>
<YEAR>2026</YEAR>
<VOL>6</VOL>
<NO>1</NO>
<PAGE_NO>8</PAGE_NO>
<ARTICLES>
			<ARTICLE>
				<TitleF></TitleF>
				<TitleE>Finite element analysis of additive manufacturing-enabled cellular architectures for morphing airfoil applications</TitleE>
				<TitleLang_ID>en</TitleLang_ID>
				<ABSTRACTS>
					<ABSTRACT>
						<Language_ID>en</Language_ID>
						<CONTENT>Morphing airfoil structures require internal architectures that provide both sufficient flexibility and structural reliability while remaining compatible with advanced manufacturing techniques. In this study, the structural performance of different cellular core configurations suitable for additive manufacturing was investigated using finite element analysis. Four internal architectures were considered, including a conventional honeycomb structure (HC), a re-entrant auxetic structure (RA), and two modified auxetic configurations (CA-1 and CA-2). The airfoil models were subjected to loading conditions ranging from 50 N to 300 N to evaluate stress distribution and deformation behavior. The results demonstrate that cellular geometry significantly influences the mechanical response of the morphing airfoil. The HC configuration exhibited the highest stiffness, with the lowest displacement (2.63 mm at 300 N), but showed pronounced stress concentration. In contrast, the auxetic configurations provided more uniform stress distribution due to their geometry-driven deformation mechanisms. The CA-2 design showed the highest deformation capability, indicating enhanced flexibility and morphing potential, while also maintaining a relatively uniform stress distribution. In contrast, the RA configuration exhibited localized stress concentration associated with its re-entrant geometry. Overall, the modified auxetic configuration CA-2 demonstrated the most balanced mechanical performance by combining improved stress redistribution with high deformation capability. The results highlight that geometrically optimized auxetic structures, which can be readily fabricated using laser-based additive manufacturing techniques, offer significant potential for morphing airfoil applications.</CONTENT>
					</ABSTRACT>
				</ABSTRACTS>
				<PAGES>
					<PAGE>
						<FPAGE>41</FPAGE>
						<TPAGE>48</TPAGE>
					</PAGE>
				</PAGES>
				<AUTHORS>
					<AUTHOR>
						<NameE>Tyou</NameE>
						<MidNameE></MidNameE>		
						<FamilyE>Al-Oussainne</FamilyE>
						<Organizations>
							<Organization>Department of Aeronautical Engineering, Faculty of Aviation and Space Sciences</Organization>
						</Organizations>
						<Universities>
							<University>University of Kyrenia, Kyrenia, Mersin 10</University>
						</Universities>
						<Countries>
							<Country>Turkey</Country>
						</Countries>
						<EMAILS>
							<Email></Email>			
						</EMAILS>
					</AUTHOR>
					<AUTHOR>
						<NameE>Ata</NameE>
						<MidNameE></MidNameE>		
						<FamilyE>Khabaz-Aghdam</FamilyE>
						<Organizations>
							<Organization>Department of Aeronautical Engineering, Faculty of Aviation and Space Sciences</Organization>
						</Organizations>
						<Universities>
							<University>University of Kyrenia, Kyrenia, Mersin 10</University>
						</Universities>
						<Countries>
							<Country>Turkey</Country>
						</Countries>
						<EMAILS>
							<Email>ata.khabazaghdam@kyrenia.edu.tr</Email>			
						</EMAILS>
					</AUTHOR>
				</AUTHORS>
				<KEYWORDS>
					<KEYWORD>
						<KeyText>Morphing airfoil</KeyText>
					</KEYWORD>
					<KEYWORD>
						<KeyText>Cellular internal structures</KeyText>
					</KEYWORD>
					<KEYWORD>
						<KeyText>Auxetic structure</KeyText>
					</KEYWORD>
					<KEYWORD>
						<KeyText>Finite element analysis</KeyText>
					</KEYWORD>
				</KEYWORDS>
				<PDFFileName>Vol 6 No 1 Paper 5.pdf</PDFFileName>
				<REFRENCES>
				<REFRENCE>
					<REF>[1]	S. Barbarino, O. Bilgen, R.M. Ajaj, M.I. Friswell, D.J. Inman, A Review of Morphing Aircraft, J. Intell. Mater. Syst. Struct. 22 (2011) 823–877. https://doi.org/10.1177/1045389X11414084.
##[2]	J. Valasek, Morphing aerospace vehicles and structures, American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics. (2012). https://doi.org/10.2514/4.869037. 
##[3]	J. Sun, Q. Guan, Y. Liu, J. Leng, Morphing aircraft based on smart materials and structures: A state-of-the-art review, J. Intell. Mater. Syst. Struct. 17 (2016) 2289–312. https://doi.org/10.1177/1045389X16629569.
##[4]	T.A.Weisshaar, Morphing aircraft systems: historical perspectives and future challenges, J. Aircr. 50 (2013) 337–353. https://doi.org/10.2514/1.C031456.
##[5]	C. Thill, J. Etches, I. Bond, K. Potter, P. Weaver, Morphing skins, Aeronaut. J. 112 (2008) 117–139. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0001924000002062.
##[6]	B. Obradovic, K. Subbarao, Modeling of flight dynamics of morphing wing aircraft, J. Aircr. 48 (2011) 391–402. https://doi.org/10.2514/1.C000269.
##[7]	P.R. Budarapu, Y.B. Sudhir Sastry, R. Natarajan, Design concepts of an aircraft wing: composite and morphing airfoil with auxetic structures, Front. Struct. Civ. Eng. 4 (2016) 394–408. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11709-016-0352-z. 
##[8]	M. Rudresh, K.P. Prashanth, P.M.V. Kumar, M. Ravikumar, S. Sivambika, Numerical investigation on flutter control of aircraft wing using auxetic structures, Res. Sq. (2025). https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-6438799/v1.
##[9]	I. Gibson, D.W. Rosen, B. Stucker, Additive Manufacturing Technologies: Rapid Prototyping to Direct Digital Manufacturing, New York, NY, USA: Springer. (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4939-2113-3.
##[10]	T. DebRoy, H.L. Wei, J.S. Zuback, T. Mukherjee, J.W. Elmer, et al., Additive manufacturing of metallic components – process, structure and properties, Prog. Mater. Sci. 92 (2018) 112–224. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pmatsci.2017.10.001.
##[11]	T. Li, J. Sun, J. Leng, Y. Liu, In-plane mechanical properties of a novel cellular structure for morphing applications, Compos. Struct. 305 (2023) 116482. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compstruct.2022.116482.
##[12]	D. Wu, G. Yang, J. Tao, Y. Wang, H. Xiao, H. Guo, A novel cellular structure with center-symmetric cell walls for morphing applications, Compos. Struct. 352 (2025) 118644. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compstruct.2024.118644.
##[13]	X. Ren, R. Das, P. Tran, T.D. Ngo, Y.M. Xie, Auxetic metamaterials and structures: a review, Smart Mater. Struct. 27 (2018) 023001. https://doi.org/10.1088/1361-665X/aaa61c.
##[14]	Y. Liu, C. Zhao, C. Xu, J. Ren, J. Zhong, Auxetic meta-materials and their engineering applications: a review, Eng. Res. Express. 5 (2023) 042003. https://doi.org/10.1088/2631-8695/ad0eb1.
##[15]	M. Mir, M.N. Ali, J. Sami, U Ansari, Review of mechanics and applications of auxetic structures, Adv. Mater. Sci. Eng. 1 (2014) 753496. https://doi.org/10.1155/2014/753496.
##[16]	X.T. Wang, B. Wang, X.W. Li, L. Ma, Mechanical properties of 3D re-entrant auxetic cellular structures, Int. J. Mech. Sci. 131 (2017) 396–407. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijmecsci.2017.05.048.
##[17]	Y. Zhang, W.Z. Jiang, W. Jiang, X.Y. Zhang, J. Dong, et al., Recent advances of auxetic metamaterials in smart materials and structural systems, Adv. Funct. Mater. 35 (2025) 2421746. https://doi.org/10.1002/adfm.202421746.
##[18]	A. Alderson, K.L. Alderson, Auxetic materials, Proc. Inst. Mech. Eng. Part G J. Aerosp. Eng. 221 (2007) 565–575. https://doi.org/10.1243/09544100JAERO185.
##[19]	B. Hou, A. Ono, S. Abdennadher, S. Pattofatto, Y.L. Li, H. Zhao, Impact behavior of honeycombs under combined shear-compression, Part I: Experiments, Int. J. Solids Struct. 48 (2011) 513–525. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijsolstr.2010.11.005.
##[20]	P. Bettini, A. Airoldi, G. Sala, L. Di Landro, M. Ruzzene, A. Spadoni, Composite chiral structures for morphing airfoils: Numerical analyses and development of a manufacturing process, Compos. B: Eng. 41 (2010) 133–147. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compositesb.2009.10.005.
##[21]	ASM International: ASM Aerospace Specification Metals Inc. Aluminum 6061-T6; 6061-T651. Materials Park (OH): American Society of Materials. (2017). 
					</REF>
				</REFRENCE>
					</REFRENCES>
			</ARTICLE>
			</ARTICLES>
</ISCJOURNAL>
</XML>